When I was fourteen, Jones Oakley was kind of a mystery to me. I could certainly take in that he was a farmer, tobacco and chickens. He always wore overalls and rarely had much to say. I was a “Yankee” kid, as my father frequently reminded me in his casual conversation, and I had always lived in cities or towns, but I didn’t think of myself as a city boy. At Covington though, I had to redefine myself. To everyone I came to know, I was a citified Yankee but I couldn’t feel what that was. While they contrasted me with my new surroundings, I had to absorb my new environment as I ran into it. There was no preparation and no one with whom to share the experience of the new circumstances. I had to work it out, or more frequently like stepping on a rake, my new habitat flew up and hit me in the face. More examples of that later.
Jones Oakley was a tenant farmer. I heard my parents say that but it was years before I fully understood the sociological context of that label in the South in 1948. Like so many things, I came to recognize tenant farming as rooted in the disastrous outcome of the Civil War. Like share cropping elsewhere, the term defined a degree of entitlement related to land ownership.
In Stokes County there were many poor white farmers who constantly struggled to support their families; and black families, descendants of slaves, who found Emancipation to be less like freedom and more like displacement. One group was referred to as “po’ white” and the other as “nigger.” Both terms I learned quickly were pejorative and never to be used in polite society by young boys. One thing that both groups had in common was lots of children because they were bound to the harvest and for that everyone needed “hands.”
Although Stokes County had not historically produced many large plantations, land ownership had tended to be concentrated in the hands of the few at the expense of the many. The agricultural economy rested chiefly on growing tobacco and making and marketing “licker.” Both were considered money crops protected by the system.
Tobacco, like cotton in other parts of the state, were labor-intensive crops divided neatly into stages of production. There was a palpable experience like respiration, in each crop cycle, sometimes uneven but necessary to a good yield. Children were introduced into the rhythm before they could walk, tethered to a quilt in the shade of the barn, within sight of the family putting in the plant bed, plowing and planting, hoeing, succoring, priming, stringing, and putting in the barn. Once a year the cured crop was taken to the tobacco warehouses, load after load and put up at auction to the bidding of the tobacco companies. Once a year there was money and if it was a good crop, all the debts contracted in the twelve previous months could be retired. What was left over determined the caliber of life the family could expect for a year. A description of the cycle may sound plodding, pedestrian, even a little mundane, but even in depressions and bad crop years, a tight family dynamic provided a satisfying security.
Tenant farming became the final solution after the end of slavery, where the slave was free without the skills or education for independent action and the plantation owner and manager lost their means of production. Without the land, the slave could not work. Without the field hands, the landowner could not produce a crop. Without money, neither could subsist. Many convolutions were tried and failed to meet the need for farm laborers until land owners saw that without money, the freed slave and the poor white farmer were unable to rent the land. Tenant farming, as the alternative, had many of the elements of the indentured servitude of past generations. The land owner provided land and housing and advanced the cost of the crop or co-signed the tenant’s note, with a written agreement that the tenant family would “work the crop” for the year. At the end of the crop year, as portions of the crop were being sold at auction, cost would be settled and the owner and tenant would divide what was left in an agreed percentage. All obligations were presumed to be satisfied.
This is the background from which the Jones Oakley family, as a result of frugal practices, had been able to move up onto their own farm on Star Route. In their new house across the dirt drive from Covington, Jones took advantage of Federal farm programs and added chicken farming. He built several chicken houses and was thus able to secure his farm on two cash crops. Regrettably, after only about a year, one of his long chicken houses, filled with a new crop of pullets, caught fire and pullets and building went up in flames.
It was a major setback and one of Jones’ friends, learning of his calamity, pulled up in the side yard in his enclosed van. Jones ambled up and with friend and friend’s friend, they got in the back and closed the rear door of the van. Jones was known to enjoy a good drink of home-made liquor but any excesses he usually reserved for moments of high drama like when his wife had another child or like this time, when he had a serious financial loss.
Leigh and I were at home and by our Yankee naivete, we had not suspected what was going on inside the van until the door opened and Jones rolled out about an hour after he had entered. He rose spastically to his feet, as if the fall had been an intended exit and his friends staggered out behind him. In a short while the friends drove off down the gravel driveway showing clearly the degree of difficulty in keeping four tires on two gravel ruts in a straight line.
Instead of going back toward his house, Jones pondered a minute, then turned toward Covington where he could tell we were at work stripping paint. We didn’t stop right away because it was clear it was going to take Jones some time to master the stone walkway to the house and the steps to the porch. Leigh went out to greet him and he announced that he had come by because he wanted to see what we were doing to the house. Leigh invited him in and he said, “beve I will.”
There was no effort to give him a guided tour. Jones wanted to maneuver at his own unpredictable speed. In the dining room, still pretty free of furniture, we had already hung a colored print from our great grandfather’s home in Easton, Pennsylvania. It was the scene of an English Midland farm yard with a husband and wife surrounded by a myriad of animals. Jones stood weaving in front of the scene which obviously appealed to his nature as a farmer. With a single raised finger weaving as if making figure eights in the air, he pointed out each animal form. After some minutes he was ready to move on and so he climbed the steep boxed stairs to the second floor. We were happy for the diversion and Jones was on a mission. He made abbreviated findings in each room, nothing censorious, just perceptions. Then he navigated down the stairs and found himself once more in the dining room where he was again attracted to the scene over the mantle. He approached directly and once more identified the animals, whispering to himself. Then he turned with the wide look of discovery toward Leigh. “Ain’t it nice. Ya’ll got the same pitcher downstairs ya’ll got upstairs,” he stated with satisfaction and wandered home.
The Oakleys were a hard-working family. Often, I would go to see them at work in the tobacco fields and they always seemed to enjoy the opportunity to introduce me to their process. I would practice stringing, and hanging leaves in the barn. I didn’t urge them to let me sucker the plants or hoe, but I did it, and I only remember plowing with the mule to unsatisfactory results that had to be done over. Break time, with refreshing iced tea and Moon Pies, was fun.
My favorite memory of the Oakleys was centered in the kitchen with Mrs. Oakley, I always called her that. The permeated smell was of fat back and molasses, and biscuits baking. These were not fast-food biscuits. She would go to the big flour box on the kitchen floor, life the lid and portion out her flour. Then she would mix and bake the most fantastic biscuits, big as a hand. Someone called them “ho-cakes”. Smeared with molasses or a slab of country ham, they were delightful to a Yankee boy and my mouth waters today as I recall the tastes. The family would delight in my ignorance – laugh and laugh with me.
I came to understand much later that the Oakley family was part of a generation of Stokes farmers, previously tied to the farm, who were able in this generation to break the cycle of social poverty that had suppressed them. Such families moved up from the red clay tract at the end of a ragged road, to the “main surface” of “Star Route.” Government programs of the Depression Era, had provided the lift they needed, to combine with their fortitude, to make the transition. The younger Oakleys, my generation, were able to marry, get an education and built brick houses on an acre or two of the family land. Their children were raised in a middle-class society where they were free to be anything they could dream. I will forever be grateful for the people-education that Jones and Mrs. Oakley gave to this “Yankee boy.”